Hello robertteh,
Your argument is very American. Since I am not on the side of the
American, I must be on the side of the osama and the sadamn.
Countries like France, Germany, India and even the Philippines are
fighting the war of terrorism on their own fronts. Israel has been
fighting Hamas for yrs but we dont see countries like Spain
involved, does it mean that Spain is on Hamass side?
Bear in mind, terrorists attacks and suicide bombings have been in
existence outside of America for yrs and it was only after 911 did
the America start full scale war on terrorism. Before that,
ameicans closest ally, the saudis was funding the osama network
and CIA training osama in Afganistan. 
I am sure this is
nothing to you. The point is, war against terrorism is not America
vs the terrorists, it is the civilized world vs the
extremists.
Can USA with its military might can easily go around conquering
the world if it wants to and not have to account its action to any
diehards or UN? If the American hasnt learnt from Vietnam, by now
they should have learnt a lesson in Iraq.
If we talk about playing big brothers in the middle east, we
better have a proper perspective of the social and political
situation there. Bush obviously does not even know who could be the
big brother in Iraq. But is it difficult to find how ignorant the
Americans and their diehard supporters can be about the world, its
social, political, cultural and religious diversities? 
Policeman never alone arrest, try and sentence a suspect, and
never with his own set of laws! 
If USA does not play the rules of nations, because Hamas, Osama
and the like break the rules of mutual respects for mankind and
peace among nations, does it make USA the like of Hamas and Osama?
Have I not answered you about the possible threat from Iran and
Iraq?? Read my posts carefully. Firstly, is the threat to be taken
seriously? Is it a political propaganda? How and when can a threat
from Iran become real? A fabricated threat such as that of the
Iraqi WMD cannot be used again for free American military action!
Secondly, if it is the threat of nuclear or other WMD, take it out
like what the Israelis did to the Iraqi nuclear facilities. I am
wondering why the American has yet to take action against the Kims
or the threat not real? Thirdly, the gulf war should always be a
good reminder that the world can be united, muslims or not, in
punishing the evil.
I am not avoiding the question about containing the terrorists. My
position is clear, the American has to work with the world in any
military actions, and the presence of terrorism does not give USA a
free hand in using its might military power in foreign
territories.
My question to you is simple, now that the American has acted
unilaterally militarily outside of its own territory, where is the
check before the worlds ONE and ONLY SUEPRPOWER and MOST LETHAL
MILITARY MACHINE are abused? I have mentioned this many times,
dont avoid!!
not listening to objective arguments? one-sided argument?
yes, yr argument is one-sided and mine is objective, understand!
